4.7 Article

Isoreticular rare earth fcu-MOFs for the selective removal of H2S from CO2 containing gases

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages 392-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.008

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs); Natural gas upgrading; Hydrogen sulfide; Rare Earth fcu-MOFs; Claus process

Funding

  1. Aramco [66600024505]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we present the implementation of reticular chemistry and the molecular building block approach to unveil the appropriateness of Rare Earth (RE) based Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) with fcu topology for H2S removal applications. Markedly, RE-fcu-MOFs, having different pore aperture sizes in the range of 4.7-6.0 angstrom and different functionalities, showed excellent properties for the removal of H2S from CO2 and CH4 containing gases such as natural gas, biogas and landfill gas. A series of cyclic mixed gas breakthrough experiments were carried out on three isoreticular fcu-MOFs, containing linkers of different lengths (between 8.4 and 5 angstrom), by using simulated natural gas mixture containing CO2/H2S/CH4 (5%/5%/90%) under different adsorption and regeneration conditions. The fcu-MOF platform has good H2S removal capacity with a high H2S/CO2 selectivity, outperforming benchmark materials like activated carbon and Zeolites in many aspects. The comparison of H2S removal performance with the related structures of the RE-fcu-MOFs provides insightful information to shed light on the relationship between the structural features of the MOF and its associated H2S separation properties. The excellent H2S/CO2 and H2S/CH4 selectivity of these materials offer great prospective for the production of pure H2S, with acceptable levels of CO2 for Claus process to produce elemental sulfur. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available