4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

CO and CO2 methanation over supported Ni catalysts

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 293, Issue -, Pages 89-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.036

Keywords

CO Methanation; CO2 Methanation; Ni catalyst; Support effect; CeO2

Funding

  1. New & Renewable Energy Core Technology Program [20123010040010]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20154010200820]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2015M3D3A1A01064899]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20154010200820] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO and CO2 methanation was investigated over Ni catalysts supported on different supports such as Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2, CeO2, and ZrO2. Among them, Ni/CeO2 was determined to be the most active for CO and CO2 methanation. These catalytic activities increased with increasing surface area of CeO2. To increase the specific catalytic activity for CO and CO2 methanation, various Ni-CeO2 catalysts with different Ni contents were prepared using co-precipitation method. The optimum Ni content was determined for both reactions. The prepared catalysts were characterized with inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy, N-2 physisorption, temperature-programmed reduction, temperature-programmed desorption, and X-ray diffraction. The high Ni dispersion and strong CO2 adsorption appeared to be responsible for the high catalytic activity for CO and CO2 methanation. This Ni-CeO2 can be applied to the low-temperature CO and CO2 methanation reactor to achieve high single-pass conversions of CO and CO2. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available