4.4 Article

Younger age is a risk factor for regrowth and recurrence of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas: Results from a single Australian centre

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 264-271

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13365

Keywords

pituitary macroadenoma; recurrence; regrowth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The natural history of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMA) after surgical resection is variable, with guidelines unable to define the duration of radiological follow-up. In this first Australian series, we identify risk factors for regrowth/recurrence of NFPMA to assist with guiding recommendations for long-term follow-up. Design: Retrospective analysis of all radiotherapy-naive cases with NFPMA resected between 1995 and 2013. Patients: One hundred and twenty-three cases had both >= 2 postoperative scans and >= 12-month follow-up. Measurements: Regrowth was defined as any sustained increase in diameter of residual adenoma or recurrence as any new adenoma occurring post complete resection on serial pituitary MRI. Results: Median follow-up time was 48 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 31-86). Overall regrowth/recurrence occurred in 29% (36/123). Regrowth occurred in 40% (30/76) at a median time of 44.5 months (IQR 22-80) compared to recurrence of 12.5% (6/48; P=.003), occurring at a median time of 48 months (IQR 12-96; P=.7). Further treatment was required in 66.7% and 56.7%, respectively (=1.0). Risk factors for regrowth/recurrence by multivariate analysis were presence of residual disease and younger age at presentation. The longest time for regrowth was 168 months (14 years) and recurrence 156 months (13 years). Conclusions: Presence of postoperative residual adenoma and younger age at presentation are the main predictors of regrowth/recurrence in NFPMA. Long-term serial imaging is required to detect regrowth and recurrence in younger patients and those with residual disease. Most regrowth/recurrences will occur within 10 years of follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available