4.7 Article

Optical characterization of the coloration process in electrochromic amorphous and crystalline WO3 films by spectroscopic ellipsometry

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 421, Issue -, Pages 630-635

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.176

Keywords

Spectroscopic ellipsometry; WO3; Electrochromic film; Coloration process

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572236]
  2. National Plan for Science & Technology Support of China [2013BAE03B02]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amorphous and crystalline electrochromic WO3 films exhibit quite different optical properties during coloration process. In the present work, amorphous and crystalline electrochromic WO3 films prepared by a solution method were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and transmission electron microscope techniques. A double-layer model with sharp interfaces was established for the fitting of the ellipsometry parameters. The results show that the proton favors amorphous films more than crystalline WO3 films. The refractive indices of both amorphous and polycrystalline WO3 films decrease while extinction coefficients increase with the inserting of H+ during the coloration process. But the optical parameters of the latter are much more sensitive to the H+ ions injected compared to the amorphous WO3 during the coloration process. That is the refractive index modulation of the crystalline WO3 films is about 53% at 633 nm while that of the amorphous films about 15% at the same wavelength. The Drude-like free electron model for crystalline WO3 and hopping mechanism of small polaron for amorphous WO3 are used to explain the difference in detail. These results are very helpful for the better understanding of the coloration process and for the design of electrochromic devices. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available