4.5 Article

A cohort study of low birth weight and health outcomes in the first year of life, Ghana

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 574-583

Publisher

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.16.180273

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K012126/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate the effect of birth weight on infant mortality, illness and care seeking in rural Ghana. Methods Using randomized controlled trial data, we compared infants weighing 2.00-2.49, 1.50-1.99 and <1.50 kg with non-low-birth-weight infants. We generated adjusted mortality hazard ratios (aHR), adjusted illness rate ratios (aRR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for health-facility admissions and absence of care seeking for four time periods: infancy, the neonatal period, early infancy and late infancy - represented by ages of 0-364, 0-27, 28-182 and 183-364 days, respectively. Findings Among 22 906 infants, compared with non-low-birth-weight infants: (i) infants weighing 2.00-2.49, 1.50-1.99 and <1.50 kg were about two (aHR: 2.13; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.76-2.59), eight (aHR: 8.21; 95% CI: 6.26-10.76) and 25 (aHR: 25.38; 95% CI: 18.36-35.10) times more likely to die in infancy, respectively; (ii) those born weighing <1.50 kg were about 48 (aHR: 48.45; 95% CI: 32.81-71.55) and eight (aHR: 8.42; 95% CI: 3.09-22.92) times more likely to die in the neonatal period and late infancy, respectively; (iii) those born weighing 1.50-1.99 kg (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.95) or <1.50 kg (aRR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.13-2.21) had higher neonatal illness rates; and (iv) for those born weighing 1.50-1.99 kg, care was less likely to be sought in the neonatal period (aOR: 3.30; 95% CI: 1.98-5.48) and early infancy (aOR : 1.74; 95% CI: 1.26-2.39). Conclusion For low-birth-weight infants in Ghana, strategies to minimize mortality and improve care seeking are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available