4.8 Article

Block Copolymer Patterning for Creating Porous Silicon Thin Films with Tunable Refractive Indices

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 37, Pages 31260-31265

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b16110

Keywords

block copolymer; nanolithography; porous silicon; tunable refractive index; effective medium approximation

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland via the project Photonics QCA [263594]
  2. Academy of Finland via the project PerforMant [284652]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [263594, 284652, 284652, 263594] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the use of block copolymer (BCP) self-assembly for tuning the optical properties of silicon. We fabricated porous silicon by etching a hexagonally ordered pore pattern onto the surface of silicon wafers using poly(styrene-2-vinylpyridine) to prepare the etch mask. Contrary to typical BCP lithography, we did not need to use a range of different polymers to vary the pore size. We used the dry etching time as a way to increase the pore diameter and thus the porosity. The optical properties of the fabricated porous thin films were characterized by two effective medium approximations. Both the volume-averaging theory and the 2D Maxwell-Garnett theory gave similar effective refractive index values, although the latter was more accurate in predicting the film porosity. The refractive indices of the produced thin films could be varied by controlling the porosity. A maximum decrease of 30% in the refractive index was observed at 34% porosity compared to bulk silicon. We also demonstrated over a 60% decrease in the reflectance of silicon at 500 nm wavelength. The presented BCP method can be used to tailor semiconductor and dielectric layers for photonic applications without the size limitations of conventional lithography or the unpredictability of other pore-forming fabrication methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available