3.8 Article

Outcome of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty

Journal

MIDDLE EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 87-90

Publisher

MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA PVT LTD
DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_248_15

Keywords

Corneal transplant; descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; failed graft; penetrating keratoplasty

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgeries in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: This was a retrospective, noncomparative, descriptive case series. Patients who underwent DSAEK following PKP from January 2007 to December 2012 were reviewed. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years following DSAEK. Intra- and post-operative complications, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were also documented. Demographics were associated with the visual outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with failed PKP comprised the study group. BCVA improved by 2 or more lines at 6 months after DSAEK in ten (66.6%) eyes. In the five eyes that did not experience an increase in BCVA, four had complications; detached lenticule (2 eyes), rejection (1 eye), and dislocation of the graft (1 eye). One eye had ocular comorbidity causing poor vision. The mean IOP at 12-15 weeks postoperatively was 17.4 +/- 6.8 mmHg. CONCLUSION: DSAEK for failed PKP resulted in improved vision in two-third of cases. Selection of cases for this repeat surgery seems to be a key in successful outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available