4.5 Article

Serosurvey of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in Dromedary Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Laikipia County, Kenya

Journal

ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 64, Issue 7, Pages 543-549

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12337

Keywords

Camels; Kenya; One Health; Q fever; Zoonoses

Funding

  1. Saint Louis Zoo Field Research for Conservation Grant [FRC 13-09]
  2. CGIAR Research Program for Agriculture for Nutrition and Health
  3. IFPRI
  4. Wellcome Trust [085308]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  6. Department for International Development
  7. Economic & Social Research Council
  8. Medical Research Council
  9. Natural Environment Research Council
  10. Defence Science & Technology Laboratory, under the Zoonoses and Emerging Livestock Systems (ZELS) programme [BB/L019019/1]
  11. University of Michigan
  12. BBSRC [BB/L019019/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L019019/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) are an important protein source for people in semi-arid and arid regions of Africa. In Kenya, camel populations have grown dramatically in the past few decades resulting in the potential for increased disease transmission between humans and camels. An estimated four million Kenyans drink unpasteurized camel milk, which poses a disease risk. We evaluated the seroprevalence of a significant zoonotic pathogen, Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), among 334 camels from nine herds in Laikipia County, Kenya. Serum testing revealed 18.6% positive seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii (n=344). Increasing camel age was positively associated with C.burnetii seroprevalence (OR=5.36). Our study confirmed that camels living in Laikipia County, Kenya, have been exposed to the zoonotic pathogen, C.burnetii. Further research to evaluate the role of camels in disease transmission to other livestock, wildlife and humans in Kenya should be conducted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available