4.7 Article

Cosmological N-body simulations including radiation perturbations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 466, Issue 1, Pages L68-L72

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw235

Keywords

cosmology: theory; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Villum Foundation
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RA 2523/1-2]
  3. European Research Council [614030]
  4. Wallonia-Brussels Federation [ARC11/15-040]
  5. Belgian Federal Office for Science, Technical & Cultural Affairs through the Interuniversity Attraction Pole [P7/37]
  6. Villum Fonden [00011115] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [614030] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cosmological N-body simulations are the standard tools to study the emergence of the observed large-scale structure of the Universe. Such simulations usually solve for the gravitational dynamics of matter within the Newtonian approximation, thus discarding general relativistic effects such as the coupling between matter and radiation (= photons and neutrinos). In this Letter, we investigate novel hybrid simulations that incorporate interactions between radiation and matter to the leading order in General Relativity, whilst evolving the matter dynamics in full non-linearity according to Newtonian theory. Our hybrid simulations come with a relativistic space-time and make it possible to investigate structure formation in a unified framework. In this work, we focus on simulations initialized at z = 99 and show that the extracted matter power spectrum receives up to 3 per cent corrections on very large scales through radiation. Our numerical findings compare favourably with linear analytical results from Fidler et al., from which we deduce that there cannot be any significant non-linear mode-coupling induced through linear radiation corrections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available