4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Predicting disease-related genes using integrated biomedical networks

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3263-4

Keywords

Disease gene prediction; Laplacian normalization; Supervised random walk; Integrated network

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61332014, 61272121]
  2. Start Up Funding of the Northwestern Polytechnical University [G2016KY0301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102016QD003]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020101, 2015AA020108, 2014AA021505]
  5. Northwestern Polytechnical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Identifying the genes associated to human diseases is crucial for disease diagnosis and drug design. Computational approaches, esp. the network-based approaches, have been recently developed to identify disease-related genes effectively from the existing biomedical networks. Meanwhile, the advance in biotechnology enables researchers to produce multi-omics data, enriching our understanding on human diseases, and revealing the complex relationships between genes and diseases. However, none of the existing computational approaches is able to integrate the huge amount of omics data into a weighted integrated network and utilize it to enhance disease related gene discovery. Results: We propose a new network-based disease gene prediction method called SLN-SRW (Simplified Laplacian Normalization-Supervised Random Walk) to generate and model the edge weights of a new biomedical network that integrates biomedical data from heterogeneous sources, thus far enhancing the disease related gene discovery. Conclusions: The experiment results show that SLN-SRW significantly improves the performance of disease gene prediction on both the real and the synthetic data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available