4.8 Article

How functional groups change the electronic structure of graphdiyne: Theory and experiment

Journal

CARBON
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 1-6

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.037

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chair Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. National Research Council Canada
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Province of Saskatchewan
  7. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  8. University of Saskatchewan
  9. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE- AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphdiyne's electrons have been verified to display near massless behavior, as was predicted by the Dirac cone-like shape of its band structure, and has thus resulted in an exceptionally promising semi-conducting material. We present a study of three graphdiyne samples with different thicknesses grown using a cross coupling reaction. Their electronic structures were examined using synchrotron soft X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy, together with complementary full-potential, all-electron density functional theory calculations. Excellent agreement between the measured and calculated spectra was achieved, indicating strong evidence that the correct structural model was found. We show the existence of oxygen molecules and hydroxyl functional groups, as well as pyridinic nitrogen sites in each graphdiyne sample studied. Our study shows that the defect type varies with sample thickness, which in turn strongly depends on the synthesis conditions. The band gaps of three graphdiyne samples were measured to be 0.6 eV, 0.8 eV, and 0.9 eV in agreement with our calculated values. We propose that controlling the thickness of graphdiyne films may provide a novel method for tuning their band gaps. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available