4.2 Article

Managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in head and neck cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy with concurrent radiation

Journal

ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages S13-S20

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/apm.2017.03.05

Keywords

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); head and neck; cisplatin; concurrent radiation; nausea; vomiting

Funding

  1. Bratty Family Fund
  2. Michael and Karyn Goldstein Cancer Research Fund
  3. Joey and Mary Furfari Cancer Research Fund
  4. Pulenzas Cancer Research Fund
  5. Joseph and Silvana Melara Cancer Research Fund
  6. Ofelia Cancer Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose was to retrospectively examine the anti-emetic regimens prescribed for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for head and neck cancer patients receiving moderate-or high-emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC/HEC) along with concurrent radiation treatment at an outpatient ambulatory care center to determine the efficacy of anti-emetics prescribed. Methods: Consecutive patients with head and neck cancers who initiated cisplatin chemotherapy with concurrent radiation treatment between January 2013 and June 2015 were investigated. Patients' anti-emetic use and occurrence of CINV was extracted from available clinical documentation. Patients were divided into two cohorts: CISPL-HIGH (n=161), and CISPL-WEEKLY (n=38). Results: A total of 199 head and neck cancer patients (158 male, 41 female) were included in the analysis (mean age = 59 years). In the CISPL-HIGH cohort, 33 males (26%) and 16 females (49%) experienced CINV. In the CISPL-WEEKLY cohort, four males (13%) and two females (25%) experienced CINV. Nausea occurred in 71 patients (62 HEC and 9 MEC). The odds of achieving complete response (no nausea or vomiting) were 3.5 (P< 0.0016) times more likely for patients receiving MEC. Overall, the complete response rate for the prophylaxis in MEC and HEC was 61% and 31%, respectively. Anti-emetic changes occurred in 34% and 11% of patients receiving HEC and MEC, respectively. Conclusions: In the current study CINV control for patients receiving HEC was sub-optimal. Changes to our prophylactic antiemetic regimens may help improve patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available