4.8 Article

A Highly Efficient Chemiluminescence Probe for the Detection of Singlet Oxygen in Living Cells

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 56, Issue 39, Pages 11793-11796

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201705803

Keywords

chemiluminescence; dioxetanes; live-cell imaging; molecular probes; singlet oxygen

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
  2. Binational Science Foundation (BSF)
  3. German Israeli Foundation (GIF)
  4. Israeli National Nanotechnology Initiative (INNI), Focal Technology Area (FTA) program: Nanomedicine for Personalized Theranostics
  5. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Nanotechnology Research Fund
  6. European Research Council [617445]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [617445] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Singlet oxygen is among the reactive oxygen species (ROS) with the shortest life-times in aqueous media because of its extremely high reactivity. Therefore, designing sensors for detection of O-1(2) is perhaps one of the most challenging tasks in the field of molecular probes. Herein, we report a highly selective and sensitive chemiluminescence probe (SOCL-CPP) for the detection of O-1(2) in living cells. The probe reacts with O-1(2) to form a dioxetane that spontaneously decomposes under physiological conditions through a chemiexcitation pathway to emit green light with extraordinary intensity. SOCL-CPP demonstrated promising ability to detect and image intracellular O-1(2) produced by a photosensitizer in HeLa cells during photodynamic therapy (PDT) mode of action. Our findings make SOCL-CPP the most effective known chemiluminescence probe for the detection of O-1(2). We anticipate that our chemiluminescence probe for O-1(2) imaging would be useful in PDT-related applications and for monitoring O-1(2) endogenously generated by cells in response to different stimuli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available