4.7 Article

Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 43-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.005

Keywords

City; GHG emissions; Urban carbon footprint; Accounting systems; Inventory methods

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Puglia (FCRP) (Apulia Region, Italy) [678/2015]
  2. project: Towards the Urban Environmental Sustainability: the Carbon Footprint of Foggia's municipality (Verso la sostenibilita ambientale delle citta: l'impronta di carbonio del Comune di Foggia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All cities present environmental sustainability issues, above all regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and specifically carbon dioxide (CO2), that directly affect climate change. Consequently, it is very important to quantify and report their Carbon Footprint (CF) for implementing national and international policies/strategies aimed at mitigating and adapting these concerns. The Urban Carbon Footprint (UCF), indeed, has been recognized as the more valuable choice to inform, specifically, decision makers about city environmental sustainability. Several accounting systems and inventory methods have been taken into account to perform UCF, highlighting the complexity of the topic and generating very often confusion among users. In this context, the authors aim to summarize what has been done and what is going on with UCFs, trying to classify them according to some principal dimensions. Thus, they divide UFCs in two main categories namely: spatial or direct, with a limited amount of data requested, and economic or life cycle based, more or less data inclusive according to the accounting systems considered. Furthermore, they observe that there is not a global agreed-upon protocol yet, neither is there a specific model shared among researchers, even if some steps have been made towards this direction (Relative Carbon Footprint - RCF, Publicly Available Specification PAS 2070 and Global Protocol for Community scale-GPC). Consequently, it is necessary to complete and standardize, in the short term, the accounting and reporting frameworks, in order to compare different UCFs for adopting shared climate strategies and actions at global level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available