3.8 Article

Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among type 2 diabetes in Qassim: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Journal

JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 430-436

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.04.002

Keywords

Anxiety; Depression; KSA; Risk factors; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression and to identify their associated risk factors among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: A cross-sectional, single-centre study that included 300 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus was conducted at The Diabetic Center of King Saud Hospital in the Qassim region. Anxiety and depression were measured by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Multivariable analysis using multiple logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the combined effect of various factors associated with anxiety and depression, adjusting for confounding variables. Results: Overall, 43.6% (95% CI: 37.9-49.3%) and 34.8% (95% CI: 29-40%) of the participants experienced anxiety and depression, respectively. Anxiety was more common among patients who had poor social support (OR 5.35, P 0.001). Anxiety was less common among retired people (OR 0.36, P 0.048) and those having diabetes for more than ten years (OR 0.39, P 0.006). In contrast, depression was more common among patients who had received moderate (OR 2.47, P 0.031) or low social support (OR 6.62, P 0.000) but less common among those having diabetes for more than ten years (OR 0.44, P 0.022). Conclusion: This study showed that the prevalence of anxiety and depression is high among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These results should alert clinicians to identify and treat anxiety and depression as part of multidisciplinary diabetes care. Larger community-based studies are needed to identify the magnitude of these problems and their related factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available