Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 432-454Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12102
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre of Excellence [EP/I033351/1]
- EPSRC [EP/I033351/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I033351/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper suggests how the 'grey literature', the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer-review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and organization studies (MOS). The authors clarify the possibilities by reviewing 140 systematic reviews published in academic and practitioner outlets to answer the following three questions: (i) Why is grey literature excluded from/included in systematic reviews in MOS? (ii) What types of grey material have been included in systematic reviews since guidelines for practice were first established in this discipline? (iii) How is the grey literature treated currently to advance management and organization scholarship and knowledge? This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence-based management.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available