4.7 Article

Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 117, Issue 9, Pages 1286-1294

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.294

Keywords

locally advanced rectal cancer; cetuximab-containing chemoradiation; RAS mutations; intra-tumoural clonal heterogeneity; treatment response; next generation sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK Bobby Moore Fund [C23134A9353]
  2. Merck Serono
  3. Pfizer
  4. Yorkshire Cancer Research
  5. Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences
  7. Medical Research Council
  8. National Institute of Health
  9. Cancer Research UK [15953] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10070, CL-2011-02-004] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. Methods: In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen. Results: Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90% CI: 73-88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty-four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P = 0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P = 0.055). Conclusions: This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available