4.7 Article

Variability in Total Cholesterol Is Associated With the Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 1963-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309803

Keywords

cholesterol; confidence intervals; follow-up studies; national health programs; proportional hazards models

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2016R1C1B1009972]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-Recent data suggest that visit-to-visit variability of cholesterol is associated with cardiovascular events. We evaluated the role of lipid variability as a determinant of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Approach and Results-Using nationally representative data from the Korean National Health Insurance System, 8 493 277 subjects who were free of ESRD and who underwent >= 3 health examinations during 2005 to 2010 were followed to the end of 2015. Total cholesterol (TC) variability was measured using the coefficient of variation, SD, and the variability independent of the mean. The primary outcome was the development of ESRD, defined as a combination of the relevant disease code and the initiation of renal replacement therapy. There were 11 247 cases of ESRD during a median followup of 6.1 years. There was a graded association between a higher TC variability and incident ESRD. In the multivariable adjusted model, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles of coefficient of variation of TC were 2.66 (95% confidence interval, 2.52-2.82). The results were consistent when the variability of TC was modeled using SD and variability independent of the mean and were independent of preexisting chronic kidney disease. Conclusions-Increasing TC variability was associated with an increasing incidence of ESRD. Visual Overview-An online visual overview is available for this article.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available