4.7 Article

Imidacloprid application changes microbial dynamics and enzymes in rice soil

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 123-130

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.013

Keywords

Half-life; Degradation; Biological nitrogen fixers; Eco-physiological index; Colony development index; Microbial biomass carbon

Funding

  1. ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack (ICAR-NRRI Institute) [3.4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive use of imidacloprid in rice ecosystem may alter dynamics of microorganisms and can change soil biochemical properties. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of imidacloprid on growth and activities of microbes in tropical rice soil ecosystem. Four treatments, namely, recommended dose (at 25 g a.i. ha(-1), RD), double the recommended dose (at 50 g a.i. ha(-1), 2RD), five times the recommended dose (at 125 g a.i. ha(-1), 512D) & ten times the recommended dose (at 250 g a.i. ha(-1), lORD) along with control were imposed under controlled condition. Dissipation half lives of imidacloprid in soil were 19.25, 20.38, 21.65 and 33.00 days for RD, 2RD, 5RD and 10RD, respectively. In general bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi and phosphate solubilising bacteria population were disturbed due to imidacloprid application. Changes in diversity indices within bacterial community confirmed that imidacloprid application significantly affected distribution of bacteria. Total soil microbial biomass carbon content was reduced on imidacloprid application. Except dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase activities, all other soil enzymes namely, beta-glycosidase, fluorescien diacetate hydrolase, acid phosphatase and urease responded negatively to imidadoprid application. The extent of negative effect of imidacloprid depends on dose and exposure time. This study concludes imidacloprid application had transient negative effects on soil microbes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available