4.7 Article

Heat generation in lithium-ion batteries with different nominal capacities and chemistries

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 1501-1517

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.126

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Irreversible and reversible heat; Nominal capacity; Electrode materials; Charge/discharge rate

Funding

  1. University of Akron
  2. State of Ohio's

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat generation in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), different in nominal battery capacity and electrode materials (battery chemistry), is studied at various charge and discharge rates through the multiphysics modeling and computer simulation. The model is validated using experimental results obtained in lab and the results reported by other researchers in literature. All sources of heat generation - including reversible heat generation and irreversible heat generation due to activation, concentration, and ohmic (electronic and ionic) polarizations - in LIBs with graphite/LiFePO4, graphite/LiMn2O4, and graphite/LiCoO2 electrode materials are quantified and the effects of the battery nominal capacity at various charge and discharge rates are studied. This study determines which sources of heat generation are significant and which sources of heat generation are negligible at different LIBs design and operating conditions. The contribution of LIB's different components including cathode, anode, separator, and current collectors in heat generation in LIBs is also determined. The results of this study assists battery engineers and researchers to characterize the thermal behavior of LIBs and have a much more exact prediction over the battery heat generation, leading to designing effective thermal management systems and providing accurate battery management systems for different applications of LIBs as well as cell design optimization and operation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available