4.7 Article

Factors affecting the Faradaic efficiency of Fe(0) electrocoagulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 4958-4968

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.008

Keywords

Fe(0) electrocoagulation; Faradaic efficiency; Interface potential; Fe(0) electrolysis; O-2 evolution; Fe(0) passivation

Funding

  1. NWO Veni Grant [14400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrocoagulation (EC) using Fe(0) electrodes is a low cost water treatment technology that relies on efficient production of Fe(II) from the electrolytic dissolution of Fe(0) electrodes (i.e. a high Faradaic efficiency). However, the (electro) chemical factors that favor Fe(0) oxidation rather than O-2 evolution during Fe(0) EC have not been identified. In this study, we combined electrochemical methods, electron microscopy and Fe measurements to systematically examine the interdependent effects of current density (i), anodic interface potential (EA) and solution chemistry on the Faradaic efficiency. We found that Fe(0) oxidation was favored (Faradaic efficiency > 0.85) in chloride and bromide solutions at all i, whereas carbonate, phosphate, citrate, and nitrate solutions lead to Faradaic efficiencies < 0.1. The anodic reaction (i.e. Fe(0) oxidation or O-2 evolution) only depended on i in the sulfate and formate solutions. Experiments in binary-anion solutions revealed that molar ratios of [HCO3 (-)]/[Cl-] near 100 and [NO3 (-)]/[Cl-] near 20 separated the electrochemical domains of Fe(0) oxidation and O-2 evolution in the EC system. These molar ratios were supported by experiments in synthetic groundwater solutions. We also found that the EA vs i curves for solutions with poor Faradaic efficiency overlapped but were situated 2-4 V vs Ag/AgCl higher than those of solutions with high Faradaic efficiency. Therefore, the position of the EA vs i curve, rather than the EA alone, can be used to determine unambiguously the reaction occurring on the Fe(0) anode during EC treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available