4.6 Article

Association between endotoxemia and histological features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 712-722

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.712

Keywords

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Endotoxemia; Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein; EndoCab IgG; Fibrosis; Steatosis

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H01803] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM To assess whether surrogate biomarkers of endotoxemia were correlated with the histological features of METHODS One hundred twenty-six NAFLD patients who had undergone percutaneous liver biopsy were enrolled. Serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) and anti-endotoxin core immunoglobulin G (EndoCab IgG) antibody concentrations at the time of liver biopsy were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to examine for relationships between biomarker levels and histological scores. RESULTS Serum LBP concentration was significantly increased in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients as compared with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) subjects and was correlated with steatosis (r = 0.38, P < 0.0001) and ballooning scores (r = 0.23, P = 0.01), but not with the severity of lobular inflammation or fibrosis. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that LBP was associated with steatosis score and circulating C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, and fibrinogen levels. Serum EndoCab IgG concentration was comparable between NASH and NAFL patients. No meaningful correlations were detected between EndoCab IgG and histological findings. CONCLUSION LBP/EndoCab IgG were not correlated with lobular inflammation or fibrosis. More accurate LPS biomarkers are required to stringently assess the contribution of endotoxemia to conventional NASH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available