4.5 Article

Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media

Journal

SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 621-645

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1075547017731776

Keywords

misinformation; social media; health communication; credibility; CDC

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tests whether the number (1 vs. 2) and the source (another user vs. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) of corrective responses affect successful reduction of misperceptions. Using an experimental design, our results suggest that while a single correction from another user did not reduce misperceptions, the CDC on its own could correct misinformation. Corrections were more effective among those higher in initial misperceptions. Notably, organizational credibility was not reduced when correcting misinformation, making this a low-cost behavior for public health organizations. We recommend that expert organizations like the CDC immediately and personally rebut misinformation about health issues on social media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available