4.2 Article

Best practices in peri-operative management of patients with skeletal dysplasias

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 173, Issue 10, Pages 2584-2595

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38357

Keywords

perioperative management; skeletal dysplasias

Funding

  1. Bio Marin Pharmaceuticals
  2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals
  3. Growing Stronger Foundation
  4. Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals
  5. Michael Goldberg Skeletal Dysplasia Fund
  6. Camp Korey
  7. Genzyme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with skeletal dysplasia frequently require surgery. This patient population has an increased risk for peri-operative complications related to the anatomy of their upper airway, abnormalities of tracheal-bronchial morphology and function; deformity of their chest wall; abnormal mobility of their upper cervical spine; and associated issues with general health and body habitus. Utilizing evidence analysis and expert opinion, this study aims to describe best practices regarding the peri-operative management of patients with skeletal dysplasia. A panel of 13 multidisciplinary international experts participated in a Delphi process that included a thorough literature review; a list of 22 possible care recommendations; two rounds of anonymous voting; and a face to face meeting. Those recommendations with more than 80% agreement were considered as consensual. Consensus was reached to support 19 recommendations for best pre-operative management of patients with skeletal dysplasia. These recommendations include pre-operative pulmonary, polysomnography; cardiac, and neurological evaluations; imaging of the cervical spine; and anesthetic management of patients with a difficult airway for intubation and extubation. The goals of this consensus based best practice guideline are to provide a minimum of standardized care, reduce perioperative complications, and improve clinical outcomes for patients with skeletal dysplasia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available