4.7 Article

Collective sensing of workers' gait patterns to identify fall hazards in construction

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 166-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.010

Keywords

Construction safety; Hazard identification; Slips, trips, and falls; Gait analysis; Wearable inertial measurement units

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1538029, 1423379]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1423379] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1538029] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current hazard-identification efforts in construction mostly rely on human judgment, a reality that leaves a significant number of hazards unidentified or not well-assessed. This situation highlights a need for enhancing hazard-identification capabilities in, dynamic and unpredictable construction environments. Given the fact that hazards cause disruptions in workers' behaviors and responses, capturing such disruptions offers opportunities for identifying hazards. This study proposes a collective sensing approach that senses and assesses workers' gait abnormalities in order to identify physical fall hazards in a construction jobsite. Laboratory experiments simulating an ironworkers' working, environment were designed and conducted to examine the feasibility of the proposed approach. A wearable inertial measurement unit (WIMU) attached to a subject's ankle collected kinematic gait data. The results indicated that the aggregated gait abnormality score from multiple subjects have a strong correlation with the existence of installed fall hazards such as obstacles and slippery surfaces. This outcome highlights the opportunity for future devices to use workers' abnormal gait responses to reveal safety hazards in construction environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available