4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on a transcritical CO2 ejector expansion refrigeration system with two-stage evaporation

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 919-927

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.056

Keywords

Ejector expansion refrigeration system; Two-stage evaporation; System performance; Operation conditions; Experiment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adding a two-stage evaporator in the transcritical CO2 ejector expansion refrigeration system can not only regulate the quality equilibrium of system refrigerant but also improve the system performance. This paper presents an experimental study on the transcritical CO2 ejector expansion refrigeration system with two-stage evaporation under variable operating conditions. Some key performance indicators such as gas cooler pressure, mass flow rate, entrainment ratio and pressure lift ratio of ejector, cooling capacity and COP of system were evaluated through varying the volumetric flow rate of the second evaporator chilled water V-te,V-wa,V- area ratio of ejector A(t)/A(mix), compressor speed N and expansion valve opening The present results indicated that the second evaporator played a significant role in improving the system performance, and such improvement was more evident for smaller entrainment ratio. Greater gas cooler pressure, pressure lift ratio of ejector and cooling capacity of system could be obtained by increasing the volumetric flow rate V-te,V-wa,V- and compressor speed. The small area ratio of ejector was conducive to high gas cooler pressure, great entrainment ratio of ejector as well as large cooling capacity and COP of system. This study provides an approach for the improvement of ejector expansion refrigeration system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available