4.2 Article

Prefrontal cortex dysfunction in hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy contributes to executive function impairments in rats: Potential contribution for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 547-560

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2016.1273551

Keywords

Attentional set shifting; behavioural flexibility; tolerance to delay of reward; ADHD; D2 receptor

Categories

Funding

  1. CNPq - Brazil [456081/2014-3, 310257/2015-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compromises the quality of life of individuals including adaptation to the social environment. ADHD aetiology includes perinatal conditions such as hypoxic-ischaemic events; preclinical studies have demonstrated attentional deficits and impulsive-hyperactive outcomes after neonatal hypoxic and/or ischaemic intervention, but data are missing to understand this relationship. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate executive function (EF) and impulsivity, and tissue integrity and dopaminergic function in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of rats submitted to hypoxia-ischaemia (HI).Methods: At postnatal day (PND) 7, male Wistar rats were divided into control (n=10) and HI groups (n=11) and the HI procedure was conducted. At PND60, the animals were tested in the attentional set-shifting (ASS) task to EF and in the tolerance to delay of reward for assessment of impulsivity. After, morphological analysis and the dopaminergic system were evaluated in the PFC.Results: Animals subjected to HI had impairments in EF evidenced by a behavioural inflexibility that was correlated to PFC atrophy. Moreover, HI animals presented reduced D2 receptors in the ipsilateral side of ischaemia in the PFC.Conclusions: Animals submitted to HI presented impaired EF associated with tissue atrophy and dopaminergic disturbance in the PFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available