4.3 Article

Accelerometer-Measured Patterns of Shared Physical Activity Among Mother Young Child Dyads

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 808-814

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0028

Keywords

health behavior; measurement; physical activity assessment; pediatrics

Funding

  1. East Carolina University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many mothers and young children are not meeting physical activity guidelines. Parent-child coparticipation in physical activity (ie, shared physical activity) provides opportunities for social modeling and might be associated with child physical activity. There is very little information about shared physical activity using objective measures. Methods: Participants (N = 17 mother-young child dyads) completed a demographic survey and height/weight measurements, and wore a Bluetooth (R) accelerometer for 1 week. Accelerometers were initialized using the proximity function to yield both individual and proximity [a minute-by-minute log of whether the 2 accelerometers werein- or out-of-range (similar to 50 m or less)] data. Shared physical activity was calculated in MATLAB by overlaying individual and proximity accelerometer data. Results: Mother-child dyads spent approximately 2 hours per day in shared time that was mostly shared sedentary activities. Less than 1% of shared minutes per day were spent in shared moderate to vigorous physical activity. Conclusions: Mothers and young children spent a small portion of their day in shared activities. Most mother-child shared time was spent in sedentary or light activities rather than moderate to vigorous physical activity. This method for objectively measuring shared physical activity provides novel information about the context in which physical activity occurs and could be used to understand patterns of physical activity among other dyads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available