4.8 Article

Impact of Heterointerfaces in Solar Cells Using ZnSnP2 Bulk Crystals

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 39, Pages 33827-33832

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b08852

Keywords

Solar Cell; II-IV-V-2; chalcopyrite; ZnSnP2; back electrode; etching

Funding

  1. [16J09443]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J09443] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the optimization of interface structure in ZnSnP2 solar cells. The effects of back electrode materials and related interface on photovoltaic performance were investigated. It was clarified that a conventional structure Mo/ZnSnP2 showed a Schottky-behavior, while an ohmic-behavior was observed in the Cu/ZnSnP2 structure annealed at 300 oC. STEM-EDX analysis suggested that Cu-Sn-P ternary compound was formed at the interface. This compound is considered to play an important role to obtain the ohmic contact between ZnSnP2 and Cu. In addition, it was clarified that the aqua regia etching of ZnSnP2 bulk crystals before chemical bath deposition process for the preparation of buffer layer was effective to remove the layer induding lattice defects introduced by mechanical-polishing, which was supported-by TEM observations and photoluminescence measurements. This means that the carrier transport across the interface was improved because of the reduced defect at the interface. Consequently, the conversion efficiency of approximately 2% Was achieved with the structure of Al/ZnO;Al/ZnO/CdS/ZnSnP2/Cu, where the values of short circuit current density, J(sc), open circuit voltage, V (oc) , and fill factor, FF, were 8.2 mA cm(-2), 0.452 V, and 0.533, respectively. However, the value of V-oc was largely low considering the bandgap value of ZnSnP2. To improve the conversion efficiency, the optimization of buffer layer material is considered to be essential in the viewpoint of band alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available