4.5 Article

Peptide synthesis: ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy?

Journal

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 2087-2093

Publisher

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.13.206

Keywords

ball-mill; green chemistry; mechanochemistry; peptide synthesis; SPPS

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. University of Montpellier
  3. LabEx CheMISyst (through ANR programme) [ANR-10-LABX-05-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesized by ball-milling, in solution, and on solid support. The three strategies were then compared in terms of yield, purity, reaction time and environmental impact. The results obtained enabled to draw some strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and to foresee what will have to be implemented to build more efficient and sustainable peptide syntheses in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available