4.6 Article

Oxygen beams for therapy: advanced biological treatment planning and experimental verification

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 19, Pages 7798-7813

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa88a0

Keywords

biological treatment planning; hypoxia; oxygen enhancement ratio (OER); relative biological effectiveness (RBE); cell survival; ion beam radiotherapy

Funding

  1. EU project ARGENT [608163]
  2. INFN CSN5 Call 'MoVe IT'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays there is a rising interest towards exploiting new therapeutical beams beyond carbon ions and protons. In particular, O-16 ions are being widely discussed due to their increased LET distribution. In this contribution, we report on the first experimental verification of biologically optimized treatment plans, accounting for different biological effects, generated with the TRiP98 planning system with O-16 beams, performed at HIT and GSI. This implies the measurements of 3D profiles of absorbed dose as well as several biological measurements. The latter includes the measurements of relative biological effectiveness along the range of linear energy transfer values from approximate to 20 up to approximate to 750 keV mu m(-1), oxygen enhancement ratio values and the verification of the kill-painting approach, to overcome hypoxia, with a phantom imitating an unevenly oxygenated target. With the present implementation, our treatment planning system is able to perform a comparative analysis of different ions, according to any given condition of the target. For the particular cases of low target oxygenation, O-16 ions demonstrate a higher peak-to-entrance dose ratio for the same cell killing in the target region compared to C-12 ions. Based on this phenomenon, we performed a short computational analysis to reveal the potential range of treatment plans, where O-16 can benefit over lighter modalities. It emerges that for more hypoxic target regions (partial oxygen pressure of approximate to 0.15% or lower) and relatively low doses (approximate to 4 Gy or lower) the choice of O-16 over C-12 or He-4 may be justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available