Journal
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 326, Issue -, Pages 853-862Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.020
Keywords
Nitrogen oxides (NOx); Urea-SCR; Nitrous oxide (N2O); Cu-zeolite catalyst; V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst
Categories
Funding
- R&D Center for the reduction of Non-CO2 Greenhouse gases - Ministry of Environment (MOE), Republic of Korea [2013001690018]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To develop a novel selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system, V2O5-WO3/TiO2 and Cu-zeolite catalysts were combined within one canister with the former upstream and the latter downstream. The nitrogen oxides (NOx) and N2O emissions for the combined catalyst were investigated under operating conditions of engine loads and speeds in a 3.4 L diesel engine. The results from the combined catalyst were compared with those from the vanadium-based and Cu-zeolite catalysts alone. The NO conversion efficiencies for all the catalysts were higher than approximately 80% at temperatures ranging from 200 to 410 degrees C, which corresponds to the NO2 excess range. In other words, the NO2/NOx ratio was higher than 50% for the temperature range between 200 and 410 degrees C, although the maximum NO2/NOx ratio was obtained at 270 degrees C. Beyond 410 degrees C, the efficiency of the Cu-zeolite catalyst remained high; however, the vanadium-based catalyst started to deteriorate at 410 degrees C. The deterioration of the combined catalyst was not much larger than that of the vanadium-based catalyst owing to the superior capability of the Cu-zeolite catalyst. For the NO2 conversion efficiency, the combined catalyst mostly followed the Cu-zeolite catalyst. The vanadium-based catalyst exhibited an efficiency drop at approximately 270 degrees C, which is the temperature of the highest NO2/NOx ratio; however, this efficiency drop was avoided in the combined catalyst. For N2O produced over the catalysts, the Cu-zeolite catalyst produced the most N2O, while the vanadium-based catalyst produced the least. Because the amount of N2O produced behind the SCR was at most five times that in front of the SCR, efforts to inhibit N2O production from SCR are required when considering the global warming potential of N2O. The combined catalyst produced intermediate levels of N2O. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available