4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of the lattice thermal conductivity and grain/grain thermal resistance in polycrystalline diamond

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 215-225

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.007

Keywords

Thermal conductivity; Nanocrystalline diamond; Grain boundaries

Funding

  1. DARPA [FA8650-15-C-7517]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under programme grant GaN-DaME [EP/P00945X/1]
  3. Royal Society
  4. Wolfson Foundation
  5. EPSRC [EP/P00945X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P00945X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivity of polycrystalline diamond near its nucleation region have been measured by Raman thermography assisted by TiO2 nanoparticles and by picosecond time domain thermoreflectance (TDTR). This information has been combined with a finite element thermal model making use of the real grain structure, including information on the grain orientation, of the film extracted by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This methodology allows to simultaneously determine the thermal resistance between grains and the lattice thermal conductivity of the sample without any adjustable parameter. The results show that the lattice thermal conductivity of the near nucleation diamond is 5-8 times smaller than the one observed in Ha single-crystalline diamond; the thermal resistance between grains is at least one order of magnitude higher than values predicted by molecular dynamic simulations. Finally, we show how the anisotropy in thermal conductivity observed in polycrystalline diamond naturally emerges from its grain structure and the thermal resistance at grain boundaries. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available