4.7 Article

Novel system integrations of 1000 MW coal-fired power plant retrofitted with solar energy and CO2 capture system

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 1133-1145

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.093

Keywords

Solar energy; Post-combustion CO2 capture system; Coal-fired power plant; Integration strategies

Funding

  1. China National Natural Science Foundation [51106048]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Program for 863 Project [2012AA050604]
  4. 111 Project [B12034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The energy penalty of MEA based post-combustion CO2 capture technology will reduce the efficiency of coal-fired power generation significantly. The introduction of solar energy to the capture system can compensate the CO2 capture penalty. This paper proposed three integrations of 1000 MW coal-fired power plant retrofitted with solar energy and post-combustion CO2 capture system (PP + Solar + PCC), which the solar energy is used to replace the 1st extraction to heat the feedwater or provide the MEA regeneration heat demand is the main difference in three PP + Solar + PCC both in thermal and economic. The 1000 MW coal-fired power plant, solar aided coal-fired power system and coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture system (PP + PCC) are selected as the reference cases. By comparison of six systems, it was concluded that the integration of using solar energy to replace the first high pressure extraction and taking a part of intermediate pressure cylinder exhaust to provide the reboiler heat demand is the best in three strategies of PP + Solar + PCC. In addition, this paper analyzed the evaluation indicators variation with the changes of CO2 removal rate, solar collector field area, DNI, solar collector field cost, coal cost and carbon tax. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available