4.8 Article

Direct Comparison of Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C With Cardiac Troponins for the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 136, Issue 16, Pages 1495-1508

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028084

Keywords

cardiac myosin-binding protein C; cMyC; myocardial infarction, APACE; troponin I; troponin T

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. European Union
  3. Swiss Heart Foundation
  4. Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel
  5. University Hospital Basel
  6. Abbott
  7. Brahms
  8. Biomerieux
  9. Beckman Coulter
  10. Nanosphere
  11. Roche
  12. Singulex
  13. 8sense
  14. Siemens
  15. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) [G1000737]
  16. Guy's and St Thomas' Charity [R060701, R100404]
  17. British Heart Foundation [TG/15/1/31518, FS/15/13/31320]
  18. United Kingdom Department of Health through National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Center
  19. British Heart Foundation [TG/15/1/31518, FS/15/13/31320] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. Medical Research Council [G1000737] Funding Source: researchfish
  21. MRC [G1000737] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyC) is a cardiac-restricted protein that is more abundant than cardiac troponins (cTn) and is released more rapidly after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated cMyC as an adjunct or alternative to cTn in the early diagnosis of AMI. METHODS: Unselected patients (N=1954) presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of AMI, concentrations of cMyC, and high-sensitivity (hs) and standard-sensitivity cTn were measured at presentation. The final diagnosis of AMI was independently adjudicated using all available clinical and biochemical information without knowledge of cMyC. The prognostic end point was long-term mortality. RESULTS: Final diagnosis was AMI in 340 patients (17%). Concentrations of cMyC at presentation were significantly higher in those with versus without AMI (median, 237 ng/L versus 13 ng/L, P<0.001). Discriminatory power for AMI, as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), was comparable for cMyC (AUC, 0.924), hs-cTnT (AUC, 0.927), and hs-cTnI (AUC, 0.922) and superior to cTnI measured by a contemporary sensitivity assay (AUC, 0.909). The combination of cMyC with hs-cTnT or standard-sensitivity cTnI (but not hs-cTnI) led to an increase in AUC to 0.931 (P<0.0001) and 0.926 (P=0.003), respectively. Use of cMyC more accurately classified patients with a single blood test into rule-out or rule-in categories: Net Reclassification Improvement +0.149 versus hs-cTnT, +0.235 versus hs-cTnI (P<0.001). In early presenters (chest pain <3 h), the improvement in rule-in/ruleout classification with cMyC was larger compared with hs-cTnT (Net Reclassification Improvement +0.256) and hs-cTnI (Net Reclassification Improvement +0.308; both P<0.001). Comparing the C statistics, cMyC was superior to hs-cTnI and standard sensitivity cTnI (P<0.05 for both) and similar to hs-cTnT at predicting death at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: cMyC at presentation provides discriminatory power comparable to hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in the diagnosis of AMI and may perform favorably in patients presenting early after symptom onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available