4.5 Article

The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages 579-590

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1978-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Energy Foundation
  2. Fresh Sound Foundation
  3. Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  4. Mertz Gilmore Foundation
  5. V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  6. Rockefeller Brothers Fund
  7. Wallace Global Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have quantified the contributions of industrialized and developing nations' historical emissions to global surface temperature rise. Recent findings that nearly two-thirds of total industrial CO2 and CH4 emissions can be traced to 90 major industrial carbon producers have drawn attention to their potential climate responsibilities. Here, we use a simple climate model to quantify the contribution of historical (1880-2010) and recent (1980-2010) emissions traced to these producers to the historical rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level. Emissions traced to these 90 carbon producers contributed 57% of the observed rise in atmospheric CO2, 42-50% of the rise in global mean surface temperature (GMST), and 26-32% of global sea level (GSL) rise over the historical period and 43% (atmospheric CO2), 29-35% (GMST), and 11-14% (GSL) since 1980 (based on best-estimate parameters and accounting for uncertainty arising from the lack of data on aerosol forcings traced to producers). Emissions traced to seven investor-owned and seven majority state-owned carbon producers were consistently among the top 20 largest individual company contributors to each global impact across both time periods. This study lays the groundwork for tracing emissions sourced from industrial carbon producers to specific climate impacts and furthers scientific and policy consideration of their historical responsibilities for climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available