4.5 Article

Impact of 4 weeks of interval training on resting metabolic rate, fitness, and health-related outcomes

Journal

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 1073-1081

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0268

Keywords

resting metabolic rate; respiratory quotient; interval training; substrate oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and substrate oxidation (respiratory exchange ratio; RER) are important indicators of health. The effects of interval training on RMR have not been thoroughly investigated, which was the purpose of the present study. Thirty men and women (mean +/- SD age and maximal oxygen uptake: 28.8 +/- 7.6 years and 33.0 +/- 8.3 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) completed 4 weeks of Wingate-based sprint interval training (SIT), repeated 1-min high-intensity intervals (HIIT), or served as controls. Before and after training, RMR, resting RER, maximal oxygen uptake, body composition, physical activity, and energy intake were recorded. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA. RMR increased in response to 4 weeks of SIT training (1789 +/- 293 to 1855 +/- 320 kcal.day(-1); p = 0.003) but did not increase after HIIT (1670 +/- 324 to 1704 +/- 329 kcal.day(-1); p = 0.06). While SIT increased RMR by similar to 2x the magnitude of HIIT, the difference was not significant (p = 0.5). Fasting substrate oxidation and RER did not change (p > 0.05). Maximal oxygen uptake increased, and small changes were also observed in percent body fat and fat mass (p < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, SIT provided a time-efficient stimulus to increase RMR after 4 weeks in healthy adults. However, the clinical relevance of the changes observed in this study remains to be determined. Further studies should be conducted in obese individuals and those with diabetes or insulin resistance to examine if interval training (>= 4 weeks) influences resting metabolic rate in magnitudes similar to that reported here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available