4.2 Article

Potential of interval partial least square regression in estimating leaf area index

Journal

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Volume 113, Issue 9-10, Pages -

Publisher

ACAD SCIENCE SOUTH AFRICA A S S AF
DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2017/20160277

Keywords

hyperspectral data; iPLSR; modelling; partial least square regression; tropical grassland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf area index (LAI) is a critical parameter in determining vegetation status and health. In tropical grasslands, reliable determination of LAI, useful in determining above ground biomass, provides a basis for rangeland management, conservation and restoration. In this study, interval partial least square regression (iPLSR) in forward mode was compared to partial least square regression (PLSR) to estimate LAI from in-situ canopy hyperspectral data on a heterogeneous grassland at different periods (onset, mid and end) during summer. The performance of the two techniques was determined using the least relative root mean square error to the mean (nRMSEP) and the highest coefficients of determination (R-p(2)) between the predicted and the measured LAI. Results show that iPLSR models could explain LAI variation with R2p values ranging from 0.81 to 0.93 and low nRMSEP from 9.39% to 24.71%. The highest accuracies for estimates of LAI using iPLSR were at mid-and end of summer (R-p(2) = 0.93 and nRMSEP = 9.39%; R-p(2) = 0.89 and nRMSEP = 10.50%, respectively). Pooling data sets from the three assessed periods yielded the highest prediction error (nRMSEP= 24.71%). Results show that iPLSR performed better than PLSR, which yielded R-p(2) and RMSEP values ranging from 0.36 to 0.65 and from 28.44% to 33.47%, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of iPLSR in predicting LAI and therefore provides a basis for more accurate mapping and monitoring of canopy characteristics of tropical grasslands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available