4.8 Review

Bio-Optics and Bio-Inspired Optical Materials

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 117, Issue 20, Pages 12705-12763

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00153

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-15-1-0228, 12RX11COR]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET1254399, CBET 1512043]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N000141612426, N000141210089]
  4. Air Force Research Laboratory/711th Human Performance Wing [AFRL/711 HPW]
  5. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141612426] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the use of the limited materials palette, optimally designed micro and nanostructures, and tightly regulated processes, nature demonstrates exquisite control of light matter interactions at various length scales. In fact, control of light matter interactions is an important element in the evolutionary arms race and has led to highly engineered optical materials and systems. In this review, we present a detailed summary of various optical effects found in nature with a particular emphasis on the materials and optical design aspects responsible for their optical functionality. Using several representative examples, we discuss various optical phenomena, including absorption and transparency, diffraction, interference, reflection and antireflection, scattering, light harvesting, wave guiding and lensing, camouflage, and bioluminescence, that are responsible for the unique optical properties of materials and structures found in nature and biology. Great strides in understanding the design principles adapted by nature have led to a tremendous progress in realizing biomimetic and bioinspired optical materials and photonic devices. We discuss the various micro- and nanofabrication techniques that have been employed for realizing advanced biomimetic optical structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available