4.8 Article

Embedded Ag/Ni Metal-Mesh with Low Surface Roughness As Transparent Conductive Electrode for Optoelectronic Applications

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 42, Pages 37048-37054

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b11779

Keywords

transparent conductive electrodes (TCEs); metal-mesh; flexible electronics; OLED; QLED

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Research Project [2016YFB0401500]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09020201]
  3. Science Foundation of Two Sides of Strait [U1605244]
  4. Program on Key Research Project of Jiangsu Province of China [BE2016173]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2013206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-mesh is one of the contenders to replace indium tin oxide (ITO) as transparent conductive electrodes (TCEs) for optoelectronic applications. However, considerable surface roughness accompanying metal-mesh type of transparent electrodes has been the root cause of electrical short-circuiting for optoelectronic devices, such as organic light-emitting diode (OLED) and organic photovoltaic (OPV). In this work, a novel approach to making metal-mesh TCE has been proposed that is based on hybrid printing of silver (Ag) nanoparticle ink and electroplating of nickel (Ni). By polishing back the electroplated Ni, an extremely smooth surface was achieved. The fabricated Ag/Ni metal-mesh TCE has a surface roughness of 0.17 nm, a low sheet resistance of 2.1 Omega/square, and a high transmittance of 88.6%. The figure of merit is 1450, which is 30 times better than ITO. In addition, the Ag/Ni metal-mesh TCE shows outstanding mechanical flexibility and environmental stability at high temperature and humidity. Using the polished Ag/Ni metal-mesh TCE, a flexible quantum dot light-emitting diode (QLED) was fabricated with an efficiency of 10.4 cd/A and 3.2 lm/W at 1000 cd/m(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available