4.7 Article

Ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for ET intolerant or resistant to hydroxycarbamide

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 130, Issue 17, Pages 1889-1897

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-785790

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bloodwise
  2. Cancer Research UK [C22436/A15958]
  3. MRC [G84/6443, MC_UU_12009/16, MR/L006340/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Cancer Research UK [15958] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G84/6443, MR/L006340/1, MC_UU_12009/16] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Rosetrees Trust [M435] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatments for high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) address thrombocytosis, diseaserelated symptoms, as well as risks of thrombosis, hemorrhage, transformation to myelofibrosis, and leukemia. Patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC) have a poor outlook. MAJIC (ISRCTN61925716) is a randomized phase 2 trial of ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) vs best available therapy (BAT) in ET and polycythemia vera patients resistant or intolerant to HC. Here, findings of MAJIC-ET are reported, where the modified intention-to-treat population included 58 and 52 patients randomized to receive ruxolitinib or BAT, respectively. There was no evidence of improvement incomplete response within 1 year reported in 27 (46.6%) patients treated with ruxolitinib vs 23 (44.2%) with BAT (P = .40). At 2 years, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and transformation were not significantly different; however, some disease-related symptoms improved in patients receiving ruxolitinib relative to BAT. Molecular responses were uncommon; there were 2 complete molecular responses (CMR) and 1 partial molecular response in CALR-positive ruxolitinib-treated patients. Transformation to myelofibrosis occurred in 1 CMR patient, presumably because of the emergence of a different clone, raising questions about the relevance of CMR in ET patients. Grade 3 and 4 anemia occurred in 19% and 0% of ruxolitinib vs 0% (both grades) in the BAT arm, and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 5.2% and 1.7% of ruxolitinib vs 0% (both grades) of BAT-treated patients. Rates of discontinuation or treatment switching did not differ between the 2 trial arms. The MAJIC-ET trial suggests that ruxolitinib is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available