4.8 Article

Assessment of Novel Long-Lasting Ceria-Stabilized Zirconia-Based Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies as Implant Materials

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702512

Keywords

bacterial adhesion; human osteoblasts; implant materials; osseointegration; zirconia-based composites

Funding

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [280741]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of long-lasting zirconia-based ceramics for implants, which are not prone to hydrothermal aging, is not satisfactorily solved. Therefore, this study is conceived as an overall evaluation screening of novel ceria-stabilized zirconia-alumina-aluminate composite ceramics (ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11) with different surface topographies for use in clinical applications. Ceria-stabilized zirconia is chosen as the matrix for the composite material, due to its lower susceptibility to aging than yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP). This assessment is carried out on three preclinical investigation levels, indicating an overall biocompatibility of ceria-stabilized zirconia-based ceramics, both in vitro and in vivo. Long-term attachment and mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition of primary osteoblasts are the most distinct on porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) surfaces, while ECM attachment on 3Y-TZP and ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11 with compact surface texture is poor. In this regard, the animal study confirms the porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) to be the most favorable material, showing the highest bone-to-implant contact values and implant stability post implantation in comparison with control groups. Moreover, the microbiological evaluation reveals no favoritism of biofilm formation on the porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) when compared to a smooth control surface. Hence, together with the in vitro in vivo assessment analogy, the promising clinical potential of this novel ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11 as an implant material is demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available