4.4 Review

Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 59-74

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007

Keywords

Rejection sensitivity; Depression; Anxiety; Borderline personality disorder; Body dysmorphic disorder; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81671347]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rejection sensitivity is a personality disposition characterized by oversensitivity to social rejection. Using a three-level meta-analytic model, 75 studies were reviewed that examined associations between rejection sensitivity and five mental health outcomes: depression, anxiety, loneliness, borderline personality disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder. The results showed significant and moderate associations between rejection sensitivity and depression (pooled r = 0.332; p < 0.001), anxiety (pooled r = 0.407; p < 0.001), loneliness (pooled r = 0.386; p < 0.001), borderline personality disorder (pooled r = 0.413; p < 0.001), and body dysmorphic disorder (pooled r = 0.428; p < 0.001). The associations between rejection sensitivity and depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder varied by type of sample, but the associations were similar for clinical and non-clinical (i.e., community) samples. The association between rejection sensitivity and anxiety was negatively moderated by percentage of females in samples. The association between rejection sensitivity and depression was negatively moderated by length of follow-up. The longitudinal associations between rejection sensitivity and depression, anxiety, and loneliness were stable over time. Implications of the findings for both risk assessment and prevention and intervention strategies in mental health practice are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available