4.8 Article

The performance and evolution of bacterial community of activated sludge exposed to trimethoprim in a sequencing batch reactor

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 872-879

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.018

Keywords

Activated sludge; Trimethoprim; Extracellular polymeric substances; Microbial community

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708340, 51608315]
  2. Promotional Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2014HZ019, ZR2016CB18]
  3. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J15LE07]
  4. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07203004, 2015ZX07203005, 2015ZX07203-007-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance and microbial community changes of an activated sludge sequencing batch reactor were evaluated after exposure to trimethoprim for 51 days. The average chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, phosphorus efficiencies were 88.6% +/- 0.56%, 90.47% +/- 0.29% and 64.25% +/- 1.12%, respectively. The protein and polysaccharide contents increased with increasing trimethoprim concentration to protect the cells from the unfavorable conditions. The chemical composition of extracellular polymeric substances increased. For denitrifying bacteria, the read numbers of Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium and Bacillus were both significantly increased from Day 1 to 25 and sharply decreased by Day 50 (p < 0.05), which is consistent with the tendency of Planctomyces (Anammox). The read number of Paracoccus displayed an increasing trend, whereas Nitrospirales, Nitrospira (nitrite oxidizer) and Nitrosomonadaceae (ammonia oxidizer) were significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The read number of Rhodocyclaceae (phosphorus oxidizer) was significantly decreased from Day 1 to 25 and sharply increased by Day 50 (p < 0.05).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available