4.7 Article

An efficient and stable hydrodynamic model with novel source term discretization schemes for overland flow and flood simulations

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 3730-3759

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016WR020055

Keywords

overland flows; shallow water equations; surface reconstruction method; implicit friction term discretization; finite volume Godunov-type scheme

Funding

  1. NERC SINATRA
  2. NERC TENDERLY [NE/K008781/1]
  3. REMATCH [NE/P015476/1]
  4. NERC [NE/P015476/1, NE/K008781/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P015476/1, NE/K008781/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerical models solving the full 2-D shallow water equations (SWEs) have been increasingly used to simulate overland flows and better understand the transient flow dynamics of flash floods in a catchment. However, there still exist key challenges that have not yet been resolved for the development of fully dynamic overland flow models, related to (1) the difficulty of maintaining numerical stability and accuracy in the limit of disappearing water depth and (2) inaccurate estimation of velocities and discharges on slopes as a result of strong nonlinearity of friction terms. This paper aims to tackle these key research challenges and present a new numerical scheme for accurately and efficiently modeling large-scale transient overland flows over complex terrains. The proposed scheme features a novel surface reconstruction method (SRM) to correctly compute slope source terms and maintain numerical stability at small water depth, and a new implicit discretization method to handle the highly nonlinear friction terms. The resulting shallow water overland flow model is first validated against analytical and experimental test cases and then applied to simulate a hypothetic rainfall event in the 42 km(2) Haltwhistle Burn, UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available