4.6 Article

Targeting Fatty-Acid Amide Hydrolase with Prodrugs for CNS-Selective Therapy

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 2468-2476

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00239

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; FAAH; thyromimetic; prodrug; sobetirome; thyroid hormone

Funding

  1. OHSU Laura Fund for Innovation in Multiple Sclerosis
  2. National Institutes of Health [DK 052798, T32DK007680]
  3. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG 5199A4/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The blood brain barrier (BBB) can be a substantial impediment to achieving therapeutic levels of drugs in the CNS. Certain chemical functionality such as the carboxylic acid is a general liability for BBB permeability preventing significant CNS distribution of a drug from a systemic dose. Here, we report a strategy for CNS-selective distribution of the carboxylic acid containing thyromimetic sobetirome using prodrugs targeted to fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which is expressed in the brain. Two amide prodrugs of sobetirome were shown to be efficient substrates of FAAH with V-max/K-M values comparable to the natural endocannabinoid FAAH substrate anandamide. In mice, a systemic dose of sobetirome prodrug leads to a substantial similar to 60-fold increase in brain distribution (K-p) of sobetirome compared to an equimolar systemic dose of the parent drug. The increased delivery of sobetirome to the brain from the prodrug was diminished by both pharmacological inhibition and genetic deletion of FAAH in vivo. The increased brain exposure of sobetirome arising from the prodrug corresponds to 30-fold increased potency in brain target engagement compared to the parent drug. These results suggest that FAAH-targeted prodrugs can considerably increase drug exposure to the CNS with a concomitant decrease in systemic drug levels generating a desirable distribution profile for CNS acting drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available