4.7 Article

Quantifying nitrate and oxygen reduction rates in the hyporheic zone using 222Rn to upscale biogeochemical turnover in rivers

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 563-579

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016WR018917

Keywords

Radon; hyporheic residence times; nitrate kinetics; Monod kinetics; hyporheic zone; upscaling nitrate loss; FINIFLUX; oxygen kinetics

Funding

  1. Limnological Research Station, University of Bayreuth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying and upscaling chemical turnover in the hyporheic zone (HZ) is difficult due to limited reaction rate data, unknown carbon quality, and few methods for upscaling local measurements to river networks. Here we develop a method for quantifying reaction kinetics in situ in the HZ and upscaling biogeochemical turnover to catchment scales. Radon-222 was used to quantify water residence times in the HZ of the Roter Main River (RM), Germany. Residence times were then combined with O-2, NO3-, CO2, DOC, and carbon quality (EEMs, SUVA) data to estimate Monod and first-order reaction rates. Monod parameters mu(max) and k(sat) for NO3- reduction were 11 mu mol l(-1) h(-1) and 52 mmol l(-1), respectively, while the first-order rate was 0.04 h(-1). Carbon quality was highly bioavailable in the HZ and is unlikely to be limiting. Reaction kinetics was incorporated into the FINIFLUX model to upscale NO3- mass loss over a 32 km reach of the RM. The aims were to (1) to estimate hyporheic efficiency using Damkohler numbers (Da), and (2) calculate NO3- mass loss in the HZ over the reach. The Da analysis suggests that the hyporheic zone is inefficient for NO3- processing, however, this is somewhat misleading as the largest NO3- mass loss occurs at the shortest residence times where Da << 1. This is due to the largest water flux occurring in the uppermost part of the sediment profile. Nitrate processing in the HZ accounted for 24 kg NO3- h(-1) over the reach, which was 20% of the NO3- flux from the catchment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available