4.6 Article

Bi2O2CO3 Growth at Room Temperature: In Situ X-ray Diffraction Monitoring and Thermal Behavior

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages 8213-8221

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01359

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (Sinergia Grant) [CRSII2_160801/1]
  2. University Research Priority Program Light to Chemical Energy Conversion (URPP LightChEC)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1232119]
  4. COST project [IZCNZ0-174856 C16.0075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The room-temperature formation of bismuth oxycarbonate (Bi2O2CO3) from Bi2O3 in sodium carbonate buffer was investigated with in situ powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) in combination with electron microscopy and vibrational spectroscopy. Time-resolved PXRD measurements indicate a pronounced and rather complex pH dependence of the reaction mechanism. Bi2O2CO3 formation proceeds within a narrow window between pH 8 and 10 via different mechanisms. Although a zero-dimensional nucleation model prevails around pH 8, higher pH values induce a change toward a diffusion-controlled model, followed by a transition to regular nucleation kinetics. Ex situ synthetic and spectroscopic studies confirm these trends and demonstrate that in situ monitoring affords vital parameter information for the controlled fabrication of Bi2O2CO3 materials. Furthermore, the beta -> alpha bismuth oxide transformation temperatures of Bi2O2CO3 precursors obtained from different synthetic routes differ notably (by min 50 degrees C) from commercially available bismuth oxide. Parameter studies suggest a stabilizing role of surface carbonate ions in the as-synthesized bismuth oxide sources. Our results reveal the crucial role of multiple preparative history parameters, especially of pH value and source materials, for the controlled access to bismuth oxide-based catalysts and related functional compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available