4.6 Article

Expression of a novel CNPY2 isoform in colorectal cancer and its association with oncologic prognosis

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 2334-2351

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101324

Keywords

CNPY2 isoform2; colorectal cancer; expression; prognosis

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects (Health Medical Collaborative Innovation Program of Guangzhou) [201400000001-4]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772595]
  3. Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program [2015024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Recently, we identified a novel biomarker, canopy fibroblast growth factor signaling regulator 2 (CNPY2) isoform2, and subsequently investigated its expression and prognostic value in CRC patients. We initially generated CNPY2 isoform2 monoclonal antibodies and examined CNPY2 isoform2 expression in CRC cell lines and tissues using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot and immunohistochemistry analyses. We found that CNPY2 isoform2 expression significantly increased in tumor cell lines and tissues compared with that in normal colon epithelial cells and tumor-adjacent normal tissues. Survival analysis indicated that patients with low CNPY2 isoform2 expression had poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) in both the training cohort (41.7% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.007) and validation cohort (47.1% vs. 78.8%, P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, CNPY2 isoform2 was identified as a predictor of 5-year OS in both the training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.156-11.598, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (HR = 2.443; 95% CI 1.197-4.983, P = 0.014). In conclusion, CNPY2 isoform2 represents as a novel and valuable prognostic indicator for CRC patients, while the oncologic function of CNPY2 requires further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available