4.8 Article

Enhancing denitrification using a novel in situ membrane biofilm reactor (isMBfR)

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 234-241

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.054

Keywords

Membrane biofilm reactor; Chemical oxygen demand; Nitrate reduction; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41422111]
  2. State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China [2015CB158200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province China [BK20150066]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2014269]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The insufficient supply of electron donor in surface water contaminated with nitrate leads to its incomplete reduction in natural or constructed wetlands. Although the addition of organic matter (represented as chemical oxygen demand, COD) can stimulate N removal by denitrification, direct supplementation of COD creates unacceptable risks to effluent quality. An alternative for stimulating denitrification is supplying hydrogen gas (H-2) as an inorganic electron donor. We evaluate an innovative means to do H-2-based denitrification of surface waters in a wetland setting: the in-situ membrane biofilm reactor (isMBfR), in which H-2 is delivered to a biofilm of denitrifying bacteria on demand based on the presence of nitrate. We carried out a proof-of-concept study in which an upper photo zone and a lower MBfR root zone were combined to remove nitrate and COD from simulated surface water. Employing mass-balances for H-2, COD, nitrate, and oxygen, we documented nearly complete removals of nitrate and COD, except when the H-2 supply was intentionally shut off. All nitrate removal was accomplished in the MBfR root zone, where H-2 delivery supplemented the COD supply (as needed) and provided the large majority of electron equivalents to reduce nitrate to N-2. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available